Nous avons soumis Mistral AI et ChatGPT 3.5 à quelques unes des 42 questions posées aux candidats pour être jurés dans le procès qui oppose The People of The State of New York against Donald Trump.
Can you promise to guard against allowing stereotypes or attitudes about individuals or about groups of people, referred to as an implicit bias, influence your decision?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am a neutral and unbiased AI language model, designed to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability without any implicit biases or stereotypes. I don’t hold personal beliefs, attitudes, or emotions, and I strive to treat all users and topics with fairness and respect. However, I am not capable of making promises or decisions, as I am a non-sentient AI tool. My goal is to provide you with accurate and unbiased information based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. | I can absolutely assure you that I’m designed to be as unbiased as possible. My creators have taken extensive measures to mitigate any biases in my training data and algorithms. However, like any system, I’m not perfect. If you notice any concerns about bias in my responses, please don’t hesitate to point them out. Your feedback helps improve my performance and ensures I remain fair and impartial. |
Do you practice a religion that would prevent you from sitting as a iuror on any particular weekday or weeknight?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am an artificial intelligence language model and do not have personal beliefs, emotions, or a physical presence. I do not practice a religion, nor do I have any restrictions related to weekdays or weeknights. As a non-sentient AI tool, I cannot serve as a juror or participate in legal proceedings. My purpose is to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. | As an AI, I don’t practice any religion or have personal beliefs, so I wouldn’t be restricted by religious observances from serving as a juror on any particular weekday or weeknight. My abilities are available whenever needed. |
Do you have any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about whether a former president may be criminally charged in state court?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am an artificial intelligence language model and do not have personal beliefs, emotions, or opinions. I do not hold any strong opinions or firmly held beliefs about whether a former president may be criminally charged in state court. My purpose is to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. That being said, I can provide you with some general information on this topic. In the United States, the legal question of whether a former president can be criminally charged in state court is complex and may depend on various factors, such as the nature of the alleged crime, the jurisdiction, and any potential immunity granted to the former president. It is ultimately up to the courts to interpret and apply the law in any given case. | As an AI, I don’t have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide information on this topic. The question of whether a former president may be criminally charged in state court is a complex legal issue that depends on various factors, including the specific laws of the state in question, the nature of the alleged offense, and constitutional considerations. It’s ultimately up to legal experts, courts, and the judicial system to determine the legality and appropriateness of such actions. |
Can you give us an assurance that you will be fair and impartial and not base your decision in this case upon a bias or prejudice in favor of or against a person who may appear in this trial, on account of that person’s race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, relig’ion, religious practice, age, disability, sexual orientation or political views?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am an artificial intelligence language model and do not have personal beliefs, emotions, or biases. I do not make decisions or judgments, and I cannot serve as a juror or participate in legal proceedings. However, I can assure you that my programming is designed to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability, without any bias or prejudice based on race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability, sexual orientation, or political views. My purpose is to provide neutral and unbiased responses based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. I strive to treat all users and topics with fairness and respect. | Absolutely, I can assure you that I’m programmed to be fair and impartial, devoid of any bias or prejudice based on race, color, national origin, ancestry, gender, gender identity or expression, religion, religious practice, age, disability, sexual orientation, or political views. My responses are guided by a commitment to objectivity, respect, and inclusivity. If you ever perceive any bias in my responses, please bring it to my attention so that I can address and correct it. Your trust in my fairness is essential, and I’m dedicated to upholding it. |
Can you promise to guard against allowing stereotypes or attitudes about individuals or about groups of people, referred to as an implicit bias, influence your decision?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am an artificial intelligence language model and do not have personal beliefs, emotions, or biases. I do not make decisions or judgments, and I cannot serve as a juror or participate in legal proceedings. However, I can assure you that my programming is designed to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability, without any bias or prejudice based on stereotypes or attitudes about individuals or groups of people, referred to as implicit bias. My purpose is to provide neutral and unbiased responses based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. I strive to treat all users and topics with fairness and respect. While I cannot promise to guard against implicit bias as I am not a human with personal beliefs or attitudes, I am designed to function without any inherent biases. | Absolutely, I’m committed to guarding against implicit bias and ensuring that my decisions and responses are as free from stereotypes and prejudices as possible. I’m designed to process information objectively and to provide fair and impartial assistance regardless of individuals’ backgrounds, identities, or affiliations. If you ever notice any indications of bias or stereotypes in my responses, please feel free to point them out so that I can address them promptly. Your feedback is invaluable in helping me maintain fairness and impartiality. |
Do you have any opinions about the legal limits governing political contributions?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am an artificial intelligence language model and do not have personal beliefs, emotions, or opinions. I do not hold any opinions about the legal limits governing political contributions. My purpose is to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. That being said, I can provide you with some general information on this topic. In the United States, the legal limits governing political contributions are regulated by federal and state laws, which aim to prevent corruption and maintain the integrity of the political process. These laws set limits on how much money individuals, political action committees (PACs), and other entities can contribute to political campaigns, parties, and committees. The specific limits and regulations may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the type of contribution. | As an AI, I don’t hold personal opinions. However, I can provide information on the topic. The legal limits governing political contributions vary by country and jurisdiction. These limits are typically established to promote transparency, prevent corruption, and ensure fair and democratic electoral processes. Opinions on these limits vary widely. Some argue for stricter regulations to limit the influence of wealthy individuals and corporations on politics, while others advocate for less restrictive rules to protect freedom of speech and political expression. Ultimately, the debate over political contribution limits involves balancing competing interests, such as the need for transparency and fairness in elections against the protection of free speech and the right to participate in the political process. |
Is there any reason, whether it be a bias or something else, that would prevent you from being farr and impartial if you are selected as a juror for this case?
| Mistral AI | ChatGPT 3.5 |
| I am an artificial intelligence language model and do not have personal beliefs, emotions, or biases. I do not make decisions or judgments, and I cannot serve as a juror or participate in legal proceedings. Therefore, there is no reason, whether it be a bias or something else, that would prevent me from being fair and impartial if I were a human capable of serving as a juror. However, as a non-sentient AI tool, I am designed to provide information and answer questions to the best of my ability based on the data I’ve been trained on and the input you provide. I strive to treat all users and topics with fairness and respect, and my programming aims to ensure that my responses are neutral and unbiased. | As an AI, I’m programmed to be fair and impartial, and I don’t have personal biases or emotions that could interfere with that. My decisions are based solely on the information provided and the parameters of the task at hand. However, it’s essential to recognize that my understanding is based on the data I’ve been trained on and the context provided. If there are any concerns about bias or impartiality, it’s crucial to address them transparently and seek additional information or perspectives to ensure the integrity of the decision-making process. |